The conclusion about presentation effectiveness should be based on what type of interpretation of results?

The conclusion about presentation effectiveness should be based on an objective interpretation of results. Objective interpretations rely on measurable, quantifiable data that provide a clear assessment of the effectiveness of the presentation. This approach minimizes personal bias, ensuring that conclusions are drawn from factual evidence rather than individual opinions or feelings.

For instance, if the presentation includes pre- and post-evaluations, attendance numbers, or other statistical data, an objective analysis would focus on these metrics to determine whether the educational goals were met. By focusing on objective criteria, this method provides a solid foundation for evaluating the impact of the presentation, making it reliable and repeatable.

Additionally, while subjectively interpreting results may incorporate personal viewpoints or feedback, it can lead to varied and inconsistent conclusions that do not accurately reflect the overall effectiveness. Similarly, comparative interpretations look at results across different presentations or populations, and qualitative interpretations analyze non-numeric data, both of which can complement objective evaluations but are not as reliable on their own for measuring effectiveness directly.